UI · UX handoff · Performance
Frontend Development
Pixel-accurate UI implementation from Figma, React, Angular, or HTMX where it fits.
- Responsive layouts with design tokens, not one-off CSS.
- React, Angular, Vue, or Django templates when that fits best.
- WCAG-minded implementation on forms and navigation.
- Core Web Vitals because users and Google both notice.
- One team for UI and API integration.
What we deliver for frontend development
Core deliverables
- Responsive layouts
- Design-system components
- Core Web Vitals improvements
- Cross-browser QA
- Storybook documentation
Why teams choose this engagement
- Responsive UI from design system or Figma
- Accessibility and keyboard navigation
- Performance budget and Core Web Vitals checks
- Component library aligned with backend releases
Problems we solve in frontend development
-
Figma handoff missing edge cases
Designs without error, empty, and loading states force engineers to guess. We implement the full UX path on staging.
-
One-off CSS per page
Without tokens and components, every feature adds debt. We align spacing, color, and patterns with a system.
-
Cross-browser bugs found by users
Responsive layouts and form behavior need QA on real browsers, not only Chrome on a developer laptop.
-
API integration blocked on undocumented endpoints
Frontend sprints stall when backend changes without OpenAPI. We insist on contracts before parallel work.
How we build frontend development
Founder-led engineers in Surat (IST) with morning and end-of-day updates so distributed product owners stay in the loop.
Frontend work is not skinning templates. We implement responsive layouts, design tokens, and interaction states, React, Angular, Vue, or server-rendered Django templates when that is the right trade-off.
We care about Core Web Vitals because Google and your users care.
Product teams with designs ready and needing engineering execution.
Figma to production UI
Frontend work is not skinning templates. We ship responsive layouts, interaction states, and API integration with React, Angular, or Django templates when that is the right trade-off.
- Design tokens and reusable components
- Loading, error, and empty states on every flow
- Core Web Vitals measured on staging before launch
UI that ships with the API
We share sprint rhythm with the Python backend team so demos show integrated flows, not isolated component libraries that break on first real data.
- OpenAPI-driven integration and typed clients
- Accessibility-minded keyboard and screen reader paths
- Performance fixes with before/after metrics
Where we apply frontend development
Vertical experience from shipped products, not generic claims.
Why teams choose us for frontend development
Six reasons founders and product leads pick us over a generalist shop - scoped to how we deliver this engagement.
-
Full interaction states
Loading, empty, error, and success paths in scope.
-
Framework pragmatism
We pick tools your team can maintain in three years.
-
Perf audits
Before/after metrics on staging, not guesses.
-
Brand-aligned UI
Your blues and spacing, not generic Bootstrap.
-
Backend-aligned sprints
Same rhythm as the API team - integrated demos, not isolated UI drops.
-
Honest estimates
We say when a Figma file underestimates responsive or state complexity.
Is this for you?
Good fit
- Design handoff is ready with component specs.
- You need accessibility (WCAG-minded) implementation.
- You want one team for UI and API integration.
- Design handoff includes states, spacing, and mobile breakpoints.
- You want one team for UI and API integration in the same sprints.
- Core Web Vitals and accessibility are part of acceptance criteria.
Probably not
- You only need copy changes on a legacy site nobody wants to touch.
- You only need copy tweaks on a legacy site nobody will refactor.
- You want frontend-only with no backend partner accountable for APIs.
- You need brand identity and logo from scratch without build scope.
Delivery process for frontend development
How we turn design handoffs into production frontend code.
We walk Figma or wireframes for loading states, breakpoints, empty paths, and keyboard flows - not just the hero mockup. Browser targets and API integration points captured before component work starts.
Design tokens, shared patterns, and component specs tracked in the backlog alongside API contracts. Your backend squad sees the same sprint board and demo cadence.
UI built against staging APIs with PR previews when your stack supports them. Integrated demos show real data paths, not isolated Storybook states.
Core Web Vitals measured on staging, keyboard flows verified, and screen-reader checks on critical paths. Performance budgets discussed before launch traffic, not after complaints.
-
UX audit
We walk Figma or wireframes for loading states, breakpoints, empty paths, and keyboard flows - not just the hero mockup. Browser targets and API integration points captured before component work starts.
-
System setup
Design tokens, shared patterns, and component specs tracked in the backlog alongside API contracts. Your backend squad sees the same sprint board and demo cadence.
-
Feature delivery
UI built against staging APIs with PR previews when your stack supports them. Integrated demos show real data paths, not isolated Storybook states.
-
Launch polish
Core Web Vitals measured on staging, keyboard flows verified, and screen-reader checks on critical paths. Performance budgets discussed before launch traffic, not after complaints.
Stack for frontend development
Tools and runtimes we use on this type of engagement - chosen for production delivery, not slide-deck logos.
- React
- TypeScript
- Tailwind
- Angular
How we work on frontend development
-
Figma → code
Design tokens and component specs tracked in the backlog.
-
Device testing
Breakpoints and touch targets verified on real viewports.
-
Storybook / previews
UI PR previews when your stack supports them.
-
Integrated demos
UI shown against live API on staging.
Production discipline for frontend development
-
Performance budget
Core Web Vitals checked on staging builds before release. Asset budgets and lazy-load rules agreed when marketing pages are in scope.
-
Preview deploys
Branch previews for UI review when infra allows. Design and product sign off against live API responses, not static mocks.
-
A11y smoke tests
Keyboard and screen-reader checks on checkout, login, and settings flows. Focus order and error announcements verified before launch.
-
Instant rollback
Static asset and CDN revert paths documented alongside app deploy steps. Previous bundle available within minutes if a UI regression slips through.
Track record from frontend development
Metrics from shipped products and active engagements - not slide-deck claims.
- 40+
- UI builds delivered
- CWV
- Checked on staging pre-launch
- IST
- Morning & EOD sync
- a11y
- Keyboard flows in scope
Proof from frontend development
Real products we shipped for founders in the US, UK, and Europe.
Design-led teams ask whether we implement the full UX path - loading states, accessibility, and performance - not just the hero mockup.
-
Design never matches production
Featured work shows responsive UI with real data - not static Figma exports.
-
Performance hurt us after launch
We measure Core Web Vitals on staging; case studies include logged-in dashboards.
-
Accessibility is non-negotiable
Production UIs with keyboard flows and role-based views - not marketing-only pages.
Engagement models for frontend development
Frontend delivery for design handoffs, perf fixes, or full product UI with milestone billing.
-
Fixed-scope project
Discovery, written requirements, and milestone billing. Best for MVPs, redesigns, and integrations with a defined end state.
- Duration: Phased milestones
- Working: Sprint plan agreed upfront
- Billing: Per milestone or phase
- Timeline: Based on signed scope
-
Dedicated squad
A focused engineering squad on your product: weekly demos, shared backlog, and one accountable team when scope evolves.
- Duration: 8 hrs/day · 5 days/week
- Working: ~160 hrs/month capacity
- Billing: Monthly invoice
- Timeline: Sprint-based delivery
-
Part-time retainer
Smaller monthly hour buckets for fixes, dependency updates, and enhancements, with the same engineers when possible.
- Duration: 4 hrs/day · 5 days/week
- Working: ~80 hrs/month
- Billing: Monthly retainer
- Timeline: Ongoing support window
Questions about frontend development
What prospects ask on a first call about this service: scope, timelines, fit, and how we work.
- Scope & pricing
- Delivery process
- Handover & IP
- NDA & quality gates
5 questions
How do you choose a frontend stack for our product?
We weigh SEO, team skills, API shape, and release cadence. Recommendation comes with trade-offs in writing.
Do you implement design systems or one-off pages?
We prefer reusable components and tokens so marketing and product pages stay consistent as you grow.
Can you fix frontend performance without a full rewrite?
Often yes. We profile first, fix asset and API bottlenecks, then discuss framework changes only if evidence supports it.
How do you handle accessibility in frontend delivery?
Keyboard paths, labels, contrast, and focus states on critical flows before launch sign-off.
What does frontend handover include?
Component docs, build/run instructions, env matrix, and Storybook or equivalent when we ship a design system.
Need frontend delivery? Let's align on UX.
Describe your design source, browser targets, and backend integration points. We build interfaces that match your API reality - not mockups that break in week three.
- Accessibility and performance baked in.
- Honest fit check on the first call.